(Nor will it ever leave behind "plain land.")
In any case, while not a good thing either, especially for polar bears, it's not going to bring about the end of the world. Only the most pessimistic models have the Arctic Ocean ice-free in four years, and that is only during the summer. 6 or greater, than 2011 there are probably even worse years going back further.) (I only looked back 10 years but 2007 had more earthquakes, mag. Not a good thing, but a rise in temperature of 1/30 of a degree between now and 2012 is not going to contribute to the end of the world.Īlso, 2011 does not hold the record for most earthquakes worldwide. To even begin to publicly claim that the Universe was finite without being able to give a predictable ending shows a lack of self discipline and general - Average global temperatures have risen about 1degree(F) over the past 30 years. It is common knowledge that substances which are finite have predictable endings. Emptiness is the absence of space, time, matter, and energy, thus no test can be done to determine its existence. Emptiness is proven not to exist based on its own definition. So, the Big Bang theory prevents any condition where something has always been. If the big bang occurred, all math's must deal with the proof of 0=1. Once one and zero are the same according to the big bang, the definition of infinity as stated above is no longer valid. Infinity is defined as the difference between one and zero. The Big Bang theory prevents any condition where something has always been. There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that the Big Bang views one and zero as being equal, since it states that zero appeared out of the absence of zero then zero created something. NASA: 2012 – Beginning of the end or why the world won't end? And Pulkkinen says scientists have made a lot of progress in predicting solar flares and CMEs, giving time for operators to power down their satellites and for you to buy a hand-crank emergency battery charger for your smartphone. They also interfere with radio waves, making trouble for airline pilots, who rely on them to communicate with the ground.īut even with all that power, NASA says the sun doesn’t have enough energy to hurl a fireball 93 million miles to destroy Earth. Should you worry that a solar flare will kill the iPhone’s virtual assistant Siri or fry your smartphone? Pulkkinen says probably not, but CMEs have caused blackouts and can disrupt GPS satellites. Nowadays, many of us are carrying around technology far more sophisticated than a telegraph. The storm also caused telegraphs – the high-tech electronic systems of the day – to go haywire. The most intense CME on record, the Carrington Event in 1859, caused colorful auroras, even in the tropics, according to NASA. They also can disrupt satellites, cause power grids to go down and scramble electronic gadgets. When these mammoth clouds hit Earth's upper atmosphere, they cause beautiful auroras. The sun also can kick out something called a coronal mass ejection, or CME, which carries billions of tons of charged particles into space.
Solar flares happen when a very large amount of electromagnetic energy is quickly released from the sun’s atmosphere. “There is really no way that even the largest disruption can end the world.” “We have a very long record that shows that even the strongest flares can’t blow out the atmosphere,” said Antti Pulkkinen, a research scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. But NASA scientists assure us that solar flares won’t destroy the Earth. This has some people linking the flares to the End Times. Solar flare activity is increasing and is expected to peak between 20 – around the time some believe the Mayan calendar ends. And so is the end of the world, if you believe myths about the Mayan calendar and certain science fiction movies and books.
0 kommentar(er)
